Articles & Speeches



















 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affordable Housing

 

Affordable Housing
Whilst we fight to increase environmental awareness and develop aesthetically-pleasing towns and villages, we must not forget that our current generation of children are going to be placed in a very uncomfortable situation – one of disproportionately large house prices, increased rent charges and a lack of available land for new properties to be sited. Now, whilst I campaign fervently against overdevelopment on our green belts, there is such a thing as weighted development – the kind that balances our housing needs with the needs to protect our environment. It is for this reason that I am actively investigating areas of available land in the constituency, places of no great environmental significance, where small developments of 80-100 houses could be built, enabling young first-time buyers the right to have their own homes.

In Mid Dorset and North Poole, I will fight against overdevelopment in areas where residents oppose it. But, if communities wish to expand and provide affordable housing, I will campaign for their right to put such plans into action.

 

After-School Activities
It is all well and good calling for extra police to target troublesome youth offenders. Whilst this is a strategy, it is not an independent solution. It must go hand in hand with programs which are designed to tackle the root of the problem – a combination of perceived boredom and a perceived lack of integration within the wider community. Antisocial behaviour is the result of a lack of respect and a lack of options – if I can offer kids the chance to engage in the sorts of activities that actually motivate them, the kind of music- or sports-based initiatives which they will genuinely enjoy, we can then offer them a constructive way to spend their evenings and weekends. Furthermore, there may be scope to introduce an element of community integration through activities which directly benefit their area – local arts projects, for example.

 

Border Police Force
Any country that is serious about its security must have properly policed borders. As an island, this should be easier for the UK than it is for most other countries. But under Labour, we don't know who is entering or leaving the country. This is unacceptable. That is why I fully support the development of a dedicated border police force – and this is something that David Cameron's Conservatives have pledged to introduce.

To fund this, the Conservatives will scrap ID cards and spend some of the money that is saved on the creation of a fully-integrated Border Police Force which will have one clear focus: to check people when they enter or leave the UK. The new Border Police will be our eyes and ears and will take whatever steps are necessary to protect the security of our borders. Our proposal has widespread support, including from Sir Chris Fox, the former head of the Association of Chief Police Officers, Sir Ian Blair, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and from the cross-party Home Affairs Select Committee.

 

Cities
The funding and powers of the 'government puppets' – Learning & Skills Councils, Regional Assemblies, English Partnerships, the Housing Corporation and Regional Development Agencies – should be transferred to local city government. These unelected, unaccountable quangos currently control over £11 billion in regeneration funding (by contrast, council tax raises £22 billion), but the public have no way to influence the way that money is spent.

Bonds and business rates: on top of controlling capital funding currently held by quangos, the city governments should have the power to issue bonds and borrow on the open market, having their own credit rating. They should retain all the business rates they collect from new developments to provide incentives and funding for regeneration and infrastructure.

Bold leadership and powerful remit: with over 50 different funding streams for regeneration, no-one is in charge, leading to inertia and inactivity. I call for elected mayors in the cities, similar to those in the United States, which would ensure clear leadership and direct accountability. They would be held to account by councillors and the electorate. The mayors' powers would be extended to include passenger transport and highways, fire services, the delivery of welfare and direct oversight of the police.

 

Community Cohesion
We must bring down the barriers to cohesion in our country and push forward the frontiers of fairness. We must create equal opportunity for all, so that everyone has the chance to advance in life, to fulfil their dreams and to feel that their contribution is part of a shared national effort. In this country, we know that people of all faiths, and people of all colours and backgrounds, have the compassion and the wisdom to know how to live together successfully. We each have a social responsibility to make our society fairer by helping others, creating opportunity and ensuring that no one is excluded.

Instead of promoting the equal treatment of British citizens, multiculturalism has been manipulated to create division. It has often treated ethnic or faith communities as monolithic blocks, and it has led to the growth in the translation of public documents and signs into other languages. We must ensure that all our citizens can speak English and that children are taught British history properly at school. Furthermore, uncontrolled immigration puts pressure on housing and public services, and helps create division, fear and resentment among British people of all ethnic backgrounds. We can only live together if there is proper integration, and we cannot have proper integration if people are coming into Britain at a faster rate than we can cope with.

To unite communities, drawing from my own background in business and social work, I believe that the voluntary sector is critical. I stand for social responsibility, not state control, and that means giving priority to community groups in fighting poverty and family breakdown. To aid this, I support a new system that allows charities to claim gift aid tax relief automatically, to avoid present cumbersome bureaucracy. I also want to see a new law forcing government agencies to play fair when they contract with the voluntary sector, with long-term contracts that allow the voluntary bodies to plan ahead.

 

Crime
Since 1997, violent crime has more than doubled and, perhaps more worryingly, gun crime has doubled. Almost 450,000 more crimes were committed in 2005-06 than in 1998-99 – but just one in four crimes are cleared up by police.

I want to see real results for Mid Dorset and North Poole: that means more police on the streets, more funding for Police Community Support Officers, a real effort being made to integrate community leaders with those who cause the most trouble, and a system where paperwork and bureaucracy is cut back so police can actually get on with their job of protecting our communities.

Furthermore, every member of the emergency services is able to claim an essential workers allowance to allow them to buy property in the areas in which they serve. I will campaign for more police officers to buy properties in the areas in which they police, thus allowing them to become a part of their local communities – something that will allow them to build a rapport with residents, much like in the past. This is the most effective way of having friendly, knowledgeable and integrated police officers in communities.

 

Drugs Control
Drugs are becoming the scourge of our society – substances which cause social breakdown, both within communities and within families. They fuel crime, both on low-level and more serious scales. However, as recent statistics have shown, simply jailing addicts is not necessarily the best solution. The amount of reoffending and the levels of continued usage after jail (and even within jail) are unacceptable. Personally, I am more disposed to introducing a co-existing policy of rehabilitation and penal punishment – drug users, like alcoholics, need continued medical treatment to help them as they attempt to beat their conditions. We must show more compassion in this regard, whilst making it abundantly clear that we will operate a zero tolerance stance on drugs trafficking and drugs usage, regardless of the class of drug. Those caught dealing drugs should expect a long prison sentence and those caught using drugs will be given the support and rehabilitation they need to beat their addictions.

 

Education
Education is the key to social mobility. I think we, as a society, should focus remorselessly on raising standards, reversing the fashion of progressive teaching fads in favour of tried and tested teaching methods, and creating more good schools in the maintained sector. Social mobility has declined or flat-lined in recent decades with the school performance of children from poorer backgrounds falling further behind better off children as they get older. Some key subjects – the sciences and modern languages – are increasingly the preserve of independent schools.

The best way to help social mobility is to make sure our 24,000 schools have good standards of discipline and behaviour, and good standards of teaching and learning. Furthermore, I think that by removing the requirement for sponsors of Academies to contribute £2m to allow schools to become Academies should be looked at again. If donors wish to give money to Academies that is something for which they should be applauded. But there should no longer be any requirement for a contribution from an external donor on these lines as a prerequisite for creating an Academy. In essence, I call for more Academies and less red tape.

I believe whole class teaching, setting and streaming, and a robust discipline policy are effective ways to improve standards. I would like to see a number of Academy providers who commit themselves in their contracts to run schools using traditional ways of teaching, and properly evaluate the results. After all, commissioning independent research to evaluate teaching methods before they go nationwide is a scientific and long-term basis for what works best.

 

European Union
I am of the belief that we should be a part of Europe without being run by Europe. There are obvious free market advantages to our union, but I do not agree that such a union should transcend political or sovereign borders. Above all else, we need to guarantee our national interests. So, provided the EU can improve trade and create a sense of unity which will prevent a repeat of the tumultuous times in the Europe of the early-to-mid 20th century, I see no problem. But, I will always fight for our voice to be heard – and to that end, I am of the opinion that the Government must hold a referendum on the European Treaty, which is a constitution in everything but name.

 

Fiscal Responsibility
I believe that economic stability should be placed before tax cuts: it is irresponsible to cut taxes if that would put at risk the low interest rates and low inflation that families and businesses depend on. Given the current poor state of the public finances, we will not be making upfront promises for overall tax cuts at the election – promises we could not be sure we could keep. Yes, I do believe in the virtue of a low-tax economy, so over time, and only when the country can afford it, I would want us to move in the direction of lower taxes. We will do this by sharing the proceeds of economic growth between lower taxes and well-funded public services. Over a cycle, the economy will grow faster than the state and the share of national income spent by government will fall.

 

Grammar Schools
The issue of academic selection is not as linear as the media might claim. I am a strong advocate of allowing students the chance to engage in self-selection – the opportunity to choose academic or vocational institutions which are best suited to their individual needs, as opposed to simply giving the power of selection to local educational authorities. If we were to follow an educational system more akin to the one found in Germany, for example, we could operate three tiers of academic institution – the science-based college, the arts-based college and the skills-based college which trains the next generation of vocational workers. In essence, this offers students flexibility and support, always tailored to their own preferences.

I admit that academic selection has a place in society as it encourages competitiveness and produces better standards. However, social mobility is my top priority and I want to ensure that children and students from all walks of life have the chance to flourish. From independent schools that support local special needs colleges, to vocational institutions which produce high-quality apprentices, we are blessed with a variety of different institutions in our constituency – and I will work hard to protect and improve these standards and this element of choice.

 

Green Sky Taxation
As a society we must show responsibility towards confronting the issues affecting our environment. I do not advocate the view that we should stop flying – far from it. But, I do advocate the stance that we will be unable to meet our national and international targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions unless we reduce the rapid predicted future growth of aircraft emissions, and tackle dirty engines. Any solution will require a combination of international cooperation and national action. I believe that the current system of aviation taxation in the UK is fundamentally flawed – Air Passenger Duty is not directly linked to carbon emissions and provides no incentives for airlines to use more fuel-efficient aircraft. Even the Government admits that it is a 'blunt instrument'.

I am following with interest the national consultation on the possibility of charging fuel duty and/or VAT on domestic flights; of replacing Air Passenger Duty with a per-flight tax based more closely on actual carbon emissions; and of introducing a 'Green Air Miles Allowance' so that people who fly more frequently pay tax at a higher rate.

If introduced, I think that these should be replacement taxes, not new stealth taxes. Unlike Gordon Brown's hike in Air Passenger Duty, any additional revenue raised would be offset by reductions in other taxes. I am pleased that, so far, these consultations have attracted widespread, cross party, support. It is a pity that Gordon Brown has chosen to oppose the difficult measures needed to help combat climate change.

 

Home Information Packs (HIPs)
Moving home is one of the most stressful things anyone can do. Yet Labour's new red tape, in the form of Home Information Packs (HIPs), threatens to make it worse, not better. Rather than protecting consumers, their new regulations will increase the cost of moving and threaten to undermine the stability of the housing market. Last July, in face of a Conservative campaign, Ministers announced that the crucial 'Home Condition Report' (HCR) element of the Packs would be voluntary. However, in their slimmed-down form, HIPs will still be required from 1 June, forcing home owners to pay £600 to put their home on the market, or else face £200 fines.

All the expert bodies with an interest in keeping the property market stable have warned that the Government should not go ahead with these HIPs at this time. The country's solicitors, surveyors, estate agents, builders, banks and building societies are all asking Labour Ministers to go back to the drawing board. A cross-party Lords Committee has warned that these regulations are neither "sensible or worthwhile" nor "likely to be effective for their declared purposes".

As a surveyor, having spent my life in property-related business, I believe in efficiency, not bureaucracy. Anything to increase mobility and lessen the burden on the taxpayer is an important measure. It is in my view that HIPs will do nothing but cause more aggravation for homeowners.

 

Human Trafficking
Human trafficking is a hideous trade in human misery which is spiralling out of control. We must stop ignoring it. We must protect the victims, and start to tackle the criminal gangs who perpetrate this evil trade.

The United Nations has described human trafficking as 'the modern slave trade'. Between 700,000 and 2 million women and children are trafficked across international borders every year. 60 per cent of illegal immigrants now in the UK arrived here illegally, the majority of them in the backs of lorries. In 2003, there were an estimated 4,000 victims of trafficking working as prostitutes in the UK at any one time. Between 2004 and 2006, there were just 30 convictions for trafficking offences. To date, there have been no convictions for trafficking for labour exploitation.

Personally, I believe we should sign and ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings 2005 (ECATHB); establish a UK Border Police Force with the expertise to intercept traffickers and their victims at our borders; ensure separate interviews are given at all airports to women and children travelling alone with an adult who is not their parent, guardian or husband, to identify potential victims; strengthen co-ordination between the relevant Government departments and the Serious and Organised Crime Agency to ensure a coherent, joined-up approach; ensure that each police force and every local authority has a strategy for dealing with suspected victims of trafficking; and set up a helpline to provide information for women who have been trafficked, and for those who suspect others of being the victims or perpetrators of exploitation.

 

ID Cards
ID cards are a bad idea. They will do nothing to improve the safety of our citizens. They are not the answer to the threat of terrorism, to benefit fraud, illegal immigration, human trafficking or to identity theft. They are a waste of money, and a Conservative Government will abolish them. Regardless of the financial costs, ID cards are a serious infringement on our civil liberties and an erosion of the historic tradition of being innocent until proven otherwise.

In particular, the Labour Government frequently states that ID cards will be used mainly to combat the threats from terrorism and illegal immigration. However, the former Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, stated "I doubt they [ID cards] would have made a difference" in stopping the 7/7 bombings, and the ID cards that are compulsory in Spain didn't stop the 2004 bombings in Madrid. Furthermore, in terms of illegal immigration, foreign visitors will not have to have an ID card unless they plan to stay in the UK for more than three months

People would prefer that the money Labour will spend on ID cards is used for more worthwhile projects, such as a dedicated UK border police force, more money and personnel for our intelligence services, more prison places and on increasing the number of drug rehabilitation places.

 

Immigration
It would be churlish to pretend that immigrants present no benefits to our economy. They take the jobs and bring expertise in areas where the British may have fallen behind. However, we have a duty to protect British citizens by limiting the extent of immigrants entering our country every year. If immigration continues to spiral, without proper governmental oversight and control, this will compromise our national security, fuel overdevelopment in a desperate bid to house these immigrants, as well as placing too large a burden on our public services.

Controlled immigration is not racist – far from it. It is a realisation that we need a proportion of new immigrants each year to boost our own economy. This quota should be flexible and the continuing products of immigration should be carefully assessed on a regular basis. With this plan, and when I apply this to Mid Dorset and North Poole, we should see an increase in productivity, without losing elements of our own culture.

 

National Security
In an interconnected but insecure world, Britain's military capability, internal security and diplomatic resources, and activities abroad, must all be resolutely directed towards making the people of this country safer.

I believe the Labour Government has misjudged our national security situation in three ways: by naively underestimating the challenge of state-building in hostile environments, the Government has damaged our international reputation and the effectiveness of the transatlantic alliance which is the key to our security; that by treating minorities as members of groups rather than as equal individual citizens, the Government has damaged social cohesion and undermined security; and that by failing to understand the effect of the calls they have made on our armed forces, the Government has overstretched them, leaving them without sufficient reserves.

I support those who wish to make more use of traditional diplomacy, with the UK taking a lead in promoting a new 'Partnership for Open Societies' which would bring together other leading democracies and regional powers to develop the institutions of stable, liberal democracy in the broader Middle East. Furthermore, I believe in giving homeland defence a new priority, and I want to place equal emphasis on enabling individuals in minority communities to make their way in society, ensuring that all individuals in Britain share a sense of national identity and adhere to the principles of a liberal democracy.

 

NHS
At present, the NHS is focused too much on targets which do not improve health outcomes. This explains in part the continuing poor performance of the NHS, despite the hard-work of NHS staff, when compared to other developed countries.

I believe that GPs should be explicitly responsible for the health outcomes of their patients, and, speaking as someone who is a governor of Poole Hospital, I would reward GPs who achieve improved health outcomes. To do this, GPs should be encouraged to deliver improved health outcomes through their contracts of service, and GPs should be able to exercise greater control and influence over local NHS services by giving them real health service budgets to hold

I want to put people back at the heart of the NHS. I will trust the professionals. Let's get rid of the top-down, centralising, interfering and insulting targets that drive our doctors and nurses mad. Progressively, patiently, carefully, we will usher in a new era of quality and care. An era where the allocation of money is determined by clinical, not political priorities. An era where hospitals succeed because people want to go to them; where they're not closed by the stroke of a bureaucrat's pen. I want an independent NHS, where politicians give day-to-day control of the health service to the people who are experts in their respective fields – on a localised level, with more money for treatment and less money for bureaucracy.

 

Pensions
Gordon Brown has destroyed Britain's pensions system, which was one of the best in the world. He robbed today's and tomorrow's pensioners of security in retirement through his £100 billion stealth tax raid and then tried to cover up that fact. No wonder people are asking, 'how can you trust him to be Prime Minister?'

And Gordon Brown has failed a second time by refusing to provide a proper package of assistance to the thousands of people whose security he has wrecked. In contrast, the Conservatives have been developing constructive proposals as a first step towards resolving the crisis of lost pensions. Our amendments to the Pensions Bill will deliver a better package to all those affected by occupational pension scheme failures.

In Mid Dorset and North Poole, I am keen to hear from those pensioners who have been directly affected by these cuts – together we will petition national government to rectify this most horrible wrong.

Nationally, the Conservatives have developed constructive proposals as a first step towards resolving the crisis for people who have lost pension savings. Since 1997, around 125,000 people have lost some part of their pension due to the insolvency of the sponsoring employer or because the employer is no longer in business (Hansard, 30 March 2006, Col.1205WA). We have tabled new clauses to the Pensions Bill (with support from the Liberal Democrats), including:

A new Lifeboat Fund to provide more generous benefits. Our proposals would set up a Lifeboat Fund to top up the pension income of thousands of vulnerable people who have lost pension savings. Benefits would be raised to the level provided by the Pension Protection Fund.

Lifeboat will be funded by unclaimed financial sector assets and Treasury loans. Long-term, the Lifeboat would be funded by collecting unclaimed assets within the financial sector. But it would receive Treasury loans in the meantime to allow it to start paying out immediately. This would get money flowing quickly to those who have suffered most and who have seen little or no benefit from the Government's slow and bureaucratic Financial Assistance Scheme. People working for a solvent employer who have lost pensions would also be included.

 

Post Office Closures
Dorset's Post Offices are under threat: Government plans to reduce support for the network will result in the closure of 2,500 sub post offices nationally. I believe that our sub post offices provide a vital service to both our rural and suburban areas, and I am therefore working hard to urge the Government to think again and provide support for what remains of Dorset's sub post office network.

It's estimated that 3 of Mid Dorset and North Poole's nineteen sub post offices could close as a result of the Government's plans. In 1997 there were 20 sub post offices in this area – and I don't think the Liberal Democrats have worked hard enough to stop this number from beginning to dwindle. That is why I pledge to do all I can to protect an institution that has a direct impact on our daily lives.

 

Poverty
Billions of people still live in extreme poverty. The developing world presents the most pressing and complicated challenge that we face today.

Around a billion people worldwide still live on less than $1 per day; almost three billion live on less than $2 per day. War has killed over 4 million people in the Democratic Republic of the Congo alone, the largest loss of life from war since World War Two. Africa's share of world trade is currently 2 per cent – down by two-thirds since 1980. One in five people around the world lack access to clean drinking water. Malaria continues to be responsible for over a million deaths a year; 90 per cent of these are in Africa.

I pledge to raise awareness of these problems and lobby central government to increase funding for meaningful international development.

 

Recycling
If we are serious about confronting the effects of climate change and tackling the excess number of landfill sites in Britain – huge dumps of festering waste, the space for which we could run out of – then we need to increase our recycling habits. Not only is this good for the environment, but it saves the community money by being a cost-effective scheme which protects natural resources by allowing manufacturers the chance to reuse materials instead of having to create new ones.

In Mid Dorset and North Poole, most areas have access to a kerbside recycling scheme – a convenient way to recycle. But, I have also been working with our local councillors to try to convince businesses that they should start recycling as well – for example, paper waste alone reaches a staggering amount and this can be easily recycled, a process that actually saves businesses a lot of money each year! In essence, recycling is a win-win situation by cutting waste disposal bills by as much as 50% a year, whilst giving our area an air of green progression and environmental friendliness.

On a related note, I believe one of the greatest contributors to our national waste problem is the sheer amount of packaging that manufacturers bundle our goods in nowadays. I want to encourage such manufacturers and producers to reduce this excess packaging, or face the other option of being forced to by new legislation. The onus should be on the producers, and not the consumers, to reduce waste from the origins of the production line.

 

Social Responsibility
Social responsibility will be the idea that underlies everything that the Conservative Party does. We all have a responsibility for our neighbours, for our country and for our planet – not just the Government.

In contrast to Labour's approach of state control, I recognise that the state can't solve everything – that our social problems need social solutions. Our country is stronger if we have big, socially responsible citizens and a limited state rather than smaller citizens and an unlimited state. For example, on crime, I am committed to putting local communities directly in charge of their respective police forces, so that the police follow the priorities of the public, not the Home Office. On poverty, I want to see an expansion in the number and range of social enterprises, which are so much better at dealing with entrenched social problems than the Government.

One of the primary tasks of Government is to set the framework and incentives for a healthy society – and to tackle the incentives for bad behaviour. For example: encouraging personal responsibility means removing fiscal disincentives against marriage; encouraging corporate responsibility means removing tax and regulatory disincentives against environmental responsibility; encouraging professional responsibility means removing disincentives in the NHS target regime against treating patients according to clinical need; and encouraging civic responsibility means removing disincentives against local councils following local wishes.

 

Sustainable Communities
Too often, the views of local people are ignored by the politicians and bureaucrats sitting in Whitehall. I want to give local communities a far greater say on how their taxpayers' money is spent. By giving more power to local people, we will help tackle 'Ghost Town Britain' – the ongoing loss of local shops, services and facilities.

I believe that we should promote local economic activity, such as local shops and services; protect the local environment; tackle social exclusion and poverty, both on a local and national level, which also includes an increase in funding for social services and local housing associations; increase local participation in democracy; and ensure the prudent use of natural resources. Above all else, I believe that local councils should be given the power, after detailed consultations with residents, to work out their own local spending plans – and the ability to allocate public spending as they see fit.

 

Trains (Green Transport)
Transport in this country is not good enough. Overcrowding on some train routes is now chronic. The trains are carrying more passengers than before the Beeching cuts – but commuters still have to stand, sometimes for hours, to and from work. My approach will encourage people to go green. It will put rail at the heart of Britain's transport system. If we are to meet our international obligations on climate change, it is clear that we need a major increase in rail use. Trains are the most environmentally responsible way of getting around – and the best way to allow those without other methods of transport the chance to freely travel cross-country. Our approach will be local and regional – not just a national strategy. We cannot allow our entire transport strategy to be determined in London. Regional demands and the needs of our communities in Mid Dorset and North Poole matter too.

 

Transparent Government
I agree with the majority of Ken Clarke and his Democracy Task Force recommendations. It reported back with the following policy suggestions: a system should be established to entrench a process of collective Cabinet government. This will require a new and strengthened Ministerial Code, approved by a Parliamentary resolution, covering the required procedures for approval of policies by Cabinet; responsibility for monitoring the Code should be taken out of the hands of the Prime Minister and made the responsibility of a body with powers comparable to those of the National Audit Office, reporting to a Parliamentary Committee; the Committee on Standards in Public Life should establish a code of conduct for government publications and advertising campaigns.

Decisions to go to war or to commit troops to areas of conflict should require Parliamentary approval. Decisions on war-making should no longer rest solely on the unfettered use of the Royal Prerogative by the Prime Minister; treaties with financial, legal or territorial implications for the United Kingdom or its citizens should require Parliamentary approval prior to ratification, and they should no longer involve the use of the Royal Prerogative.

Full independence should be given to the Office of National Statistics, and an annual audit should be made of the use of statistics in all government departments; current numbers of political special advisers should be reduced by about half, and their role clearly defined as one of advice rather than having any capacity to give directions to career civil servants; the objectivity of the Civil Service must be restored and protected, and political interference in personnel decisions limited by means of a Civil Service Act.

 

Wimborne Square Development
During the Town Council's last term, a survey was undertaken to establish whether residents would support a costly and time-consuming project to "regenerate" the Town Square. In effect, such proposals would look at the traffic flow, the centre's aesthetics, the needs of both pedestrians and shopkeepers, and whether or not it would be viable to pedestrianise an area of the Square. The result was divisive. However, earlier this year I agreed to support the notion of improvements to the Square – more subtle enhancements like an examination of bus routes in the centre, with scope to re-route them to boost efficiency and to reduce emissions. Furthermore, it may be prudent to remove the "traffic roundabout" which currently plays host to the town's army of taxis, in order to reduce traffic congestion. Increased consultation with shopkeepers is also important.

Over the past few months the Council has received news that East Dorset District Council is willing to invest £500,000 into the project to enhance the Town Square. We are also seeking to claim around £80,000 from Dorset County Council to boost the scale of the redevelopment. However, my concern is that this project remains largely faceless. No one has a concrete idea of what needs doing, or how, and I question whether it is prudent financial housekeeping to spend over half a million pounds in such circumstances.

Simply re-routing the buses if necessary - and perhaps removing one bus stop in the process - would surely solve the Square's largest problem, that of traffic congestion, for a tenth of the cost. Similarly, improving the aesthetics of the Square by working with Cllr Anthony Oliver's Wimborne in Bloom team – basically by creating the impression of artificial green space at a low cost, but one that will greatly boost the atmosphere in the Square – is a cheap way to address most residents' unarticulated desire: a more congenial, pleasant place in which to do their shopping and socialising.

I am more than prepared to listen to the opinions of Dorset County Council, East Dorset District Council and our own team on WMTC. I am just of the mind that unless someone can give me concrete evidence that the Square needs such improvements – and ones which are inextricably linked to the £580,000 price tag – I will be sitting on the fence with regard to this issue. I am sure there are many other causes which are more deserving of such a vast amount of public money.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




     
 

Promoted by Margaret Roebuck on behalf of the Mid Dorset & North Poole Conservative Association, 2 Westfield Close, Wimborne, Dorset, BH21 1ES.